Skip to main contentSkip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
top story editor's pick

C-Tran CEO Donaghy airs I-5 Bridge replacement plan worries

  • 0


VANCOUVER — C-Tran’s CEO Shawn Donaghy recently raised concerns about a breakdown in communication between the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program and C-Tran.

Donaghy, who spoke for roughly 25 minutes during the Sept. 13 C-Tran Board of Directors meeting, also raised concerns and frustrations about whether a proposed light rail station in Vancouver would be elevated, light rail activists within the bridge replacement team and where trains will be stored.

“There has been a lot of communication behind the scenes since (the modified locally preferred alternative passed), some things that have been a little concerning either in breakdowns in communication between IBR and partner agencies or maybe expectations of the program,” Donaghy said at the board meeting.

The project, arguably a political one more than an engineering one, relies on the backing of eight partner agencies, C-Tran being one of them. Although the agencies will not financially support the estimated $3.6 billion to $4.8 billion project, they play a key role in shaping what a new bridge across the Columbia River will look like.

Caught off guard

The biggest area of contention stemmed from whether the Evergreen Boulevard transit station — which is scheduled as light rail’s terminus in Vancouver — would be elevated or at grade.

“One of the things that concerned us a little bit was there was a pretty strong push from the program to only look at an elevated station at Evergreen; and I’ll be very frank that, C-Tran as a management staff, we are extremely opposed to an elevated station,” Donaghy said.

Donaghy said they felt caught off guard as they were reaching a point where a decision would be made.

“We really didn’t get an opportunity to discuss it internally because we didn’t really know about it,” Donaghy told The Columbian. “We didn’t get an opportunity to share that with our board and get some feedback.”

Interstate Bridge Replacement Program Administrator Greg Johnson said communication is not always perfect and that the bridge replacement team bears some of the responsibility for the communication error.

“On a megaproject like this, there are going to be some things that get missed,” Johnson said. “There’s going to be disagreements, but it doesn’t mean that things are skidding sideways; it just means that we do small course corrections to make sure our partners are on the same page with us.”

Johnson said he and Donaghy talked since the board meeting and cleared the air.

‘Right to refuse all of it’

Near the end of the Sept. 13 board meeting, Donaghy mentioned that C-Tran can refuse the new bridge.

“We want to do this in partnership. But the reality is that C-Tran has the right to refuse all of it. Period,” he said. “The reality is this is our public transportation benefit area, and no one can operate in our public transport area without our expressed approval or design action.”

Donaghy told The Columbian he did not say that to hang it over anyone’s head but rather to remind C-Tran directors it is within their power to not approve something that is not in the best interest of the region.

“I don’t see anything that he said as throwing down a gauntlet or something like that, but it just means that we have more communications, more conversations to be had,” Johnson said.

Other frustrations

Donaghy also voiced frustration with those within the bridge replacement team who worked on the failed Columbia River Crossing and have a singular public transport focus on light rail. Donaghy said that mindset does not reflect the program as a whole.

“It’s just when we go out and we talk about these things, I have some difficulty trying to have conversations with groups that are like ‘light rail is the answer,’ and I’m like, ‘light rail is an answer, it’s not the only answer,’ “ he said.

Johnson does not think there is a bias within the bridge replacement team.

“I don’t think that’s the case here, and we keep a strong eye to make sure we’re doing the right things and making sure that as we try and reach decisions we’re being inclusive of all viewpoints,” Johnson said.

The storage of light rail trains is another area of contention.

Donaghy is open to having an additional track where trains could sit for a bit but does not want an additional track where spare trains could be stored.

“This is our backyard,” Donaghy said. “You’re more than welcome to come and eat at our barbecue, but we’ll let you know where we’re going to put the grill.”

“I know you said backyard,” Vancouver Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle added. “But we like to consider this our living room, and we don’t want them storing their trains next to our fireplace.”


* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Three of Oregon’s largest hospital systems are suing the state over its alleged lack of adequate mental health care, which they say has forced the hospital systems to house patients in need of mental health treatment for months. The Oregonian/OregonLive reports Providence Health & Services, Legacy Health and PeaceHealth say the Oregon Health Authority has forced them to provide care they’re not equipped to give, for patients who should be civilly committed to psychiatric institutions such as the Oregon State Hospital. State hospital spokesperson Amber Shoebridge didn't directly comment on the lawsuit but said  officials remain focused on the care of the hospital’s patients and supporting them on their road to recovery.

Since Oregon residents voted in 2020 to decriminalize hard drugs and dedicate hundreds of millions of dollars to treatment, few people have requested the services and the state has been slow to channel the funds. Oregon still has among the highest addiction rates in the country. Fatal overdoses have increased almost 20% over the previous year, with over a thousand dead. Steve Allen, behavioral health director of the Oregon Health Authority, acknowledges that Oregon’s experiment has had a rocky start. But he says a milestone has been reached, with more than $302 million being sent to facilities across the state to help people get off drugs.

Listen now and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | Stitcher | RSS Feed | Omny Studio

Listen now and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | Stitcher | RSS Feed | Omny Studio

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alert

Breaking News