Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
In repeat of past, conservation groups challenge new dam management plan
featured

In repeat of past, conservation groups challenge new dam management plan

{{featured_button_text}}

For the sixth time since the mid-1990s, a coalition of fishing and conservation groups said it intends to legally challenge the latest federal plan for dam operations on the Columbia and Snake rivers.

Earthjustice, Columbia Riverkeeper and several other organizations allege that the new plan the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation and Bonneville Power Administration formally committed to last month violates the federal Endangered Species Act.

The plan outlines how to manage 14 federal dams along the lower Columbia and Snake rivers, including four highly controversial dams on the Lower Snake. For decades, environmentalists have pushed to remove those dams, which can hinder salmon migration to and from the ocean and contribute to a dwindling food supply for southern resident orca near Puget Sound.

Under the new plan, the Snake River dams would operate under a “flexible spill” management style, where water is spilled over the dam to aid in the survival of juvenile salmon swimming downstream to the ocean.

The conservation groups on Friday filed a 60-day notice of intent to file a lawsuit. If filed, the suit would challenge what Earthjustice attorney Todd True called a “suite of problems” with the plan, including how the federal agencies did not ensure that the dam operating plan would not jeopardize salmon populations, a key requirement of the Endangered Species Act.

For example, the new plan “sort of pretends that climate change isn’t happening,” True said.

“It talks about climate change a lot, but it doesn’t actually put together a plan that takes climate change into account,” he said. “So the ability of the plan to protect the (endangered salmon) species is probably not very good, because climate change is going to make things worse for salmon in the years ahead.”

Proponents for the dams called the threat of a lawsuit “disappointing” and “the wrong action focusing on the wrong target.”

“For over a year we’ve been hearing from a lot of groups that it’s time to move away from the courtroom and work together collaboratively and find a solution that doesn’t require just an endless loop of litigation. We were kind of expecting a different approach by a lot of the groups that signed onto this Earthjustice lawsuit,” said Kurt Miller, executive director of Northwest River Partners, which represents community-owned utilities including the Cowlitz PUD.

Stakeholders on both sides say they would prefer not to see the lawsuit actually filed. However, neither side appears willing to yield in their stance about dam removal, so the litigation is likely to reach the court.

The lawsuit would be the “sixth incarnation of a long legal fight” surrounding the dams, of which conservation groups have won five previous challenges to federal operating plans issued in 1994, 2000, 2004, 2008 and 2014, according to Earthjustice.

Courts “threw out” the last plan in 2016, True said.

Support Local Journalism

Your membership makes our reporting possible.
{{featured_button_text}}

“And unfortunately, this new plan is not really materially different than the one the court threw out in 2016,” True said. “What this plan does is say, ‘We will be OK because what we will do under this plan is a little bit better than what we would do under the old plan. But the old plan itself was illegal, and a little bit better is really not what the law says needed to be looked at.”

True added that the point of the 60-day notice letter is to give the federal agencies “a chance to figure out how they want to fix things.”

“They may not do that, of course. They have not in the past.”

Conservationists favor the idea of breaching four dams — Ice Harbor, Little Goose, Lower Monumental and Lower Granite — on the Snake River in eastern Washington. But the latest lawsuit announcement makes it clear that dam removal is the only option these groups believe will restore struggling salmon populations, said Miller, the director of the utilities coalition.

Such a move could devastate the power industry and jack up utility bills, he said. It would also disrupt the region’s river navigation and commerce system, which local ports use heavily for grain shipments.

The four lower Snake River dams produce over 1,000 average megawatts of continuous, carbon-free energy. That’s enough energy for over 800,000 average U.S. homes, according to BPA.

The dams also made it possible to barge more than 3.5 million tons of cargo, or nearly 244 four-barge tows worth, along the waterway in 2017. Much of that cargo goes to the local grain terminals at the ports of Kalama and Longview.

Instead of dam breaching, conservationists, utility groups, ports and other stakeholders should work together to address other threats to salmon population, not the least of which is warming ocean conditions, Miller said.

More recent studies have indicated that the “real threat to salmon is oceanwide because climate change is causing ocean water to warm and acidify. And that’s shifted the balance between predators and prey.”

According to one study from the University of Alaska, salmon in the Northwest region are returning sooner and smaller than ever before, “most likely because ocean conditions are more hostile,” Miller said.

“I think for some of these groups, there is kind of a desire to breach first and ask questions later. But we really believe there is a lot of science that still needs to be done to determine if that is the best approach to salmon recovery,” Miller said.

“We really think it’s a step in the wrong direction to talk about removing the region’s best tool for fighting climate change. Hydropower provides 90% of the region’s renewable power,” he added.

“Right now it feels like people are not willing to listen to new information, and they are stuck in historical beliefs. … . We are really hoping that these organizations will join us in partnerships we call for direct scientific tests of some of the things people have speculated about in the past,” Miller said.

“We don’t know of any plans short of removing the dams that will actually protect the fish. If there is one out there, we’d love to hear it,” True said. “But it’s been 20-something years since the scientists have said this is the single biggest thing we can do (to help salmon), and the evidence keeps getting stronger and stronger. And the need keeps getting more and more urgent.”

13
2
0
0
1

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alert

Breaking News