Education officials expect No Child waiver will increase spending flexibility

2012-07-21T20:20:00Z 2012-07-21T22:26:54Z Education officials expect No Child waiver will increase spending flexibilityBy Leslie Slape / The Daily News Longview Daily News
July 21, 2012 8:20 pm  • 

Local school districts will have more leeway on how to spend federal money now that Washington has been granted a waiver from No Child Left Behind requirements, Longview school officials said.

"This removes some of the strings as to how you can spend Title I dollars," said Dana Jones, executive director of teaching and learning for the Longview School District. "Now we can really focus on using the dollars we are allotted to try and make a difference for those kids."

The Obama administration on July 6 granted Washington's request for a waiver, leaving school accountability in the hands of the state. On Thursday, Oregon was also granted a waiver.

Jones and Longview District spokeswoman Sandy Catt said Thursday under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002, the district was required to pay busing costs for elementary students who transferred out of a school that was not meeting adequate yearly progress (AYP) and into one that was. In the 2011-12 school year, extra transportation costs were $50,881, Catt said.

Jones sent a letter to the parents of the 98 students who requested transfer under AYP School Choice, giving them the option of arranging student transport to the new school or staying in their child's neighborhood school.

"So far, we've had good response to the letter," Catt said. "We're not having anyone upset so far."

Another cost savings: schools are not required to pay for outside tutoring services.

"The cost was considerable" and student improvement was difficult to assess because the tutors measured progress in a different way than NCLB mandates that schools measure it, Jones said. Much of the cost came from a huge burden of paperwork, she said.

All the changes should help students, she said, adding "We want every child meeting standards."

She is excited about the state's new way of measuring student progress. Under NCLB, states reported data from reading and math assessments in particular grades. For example, third-graders in one year are compared with third-graders in other years.

Under the new system, students will be tracked as they progress through grades. Scores from third-graders in one year will be compared with scores from the same students as second-graders, putting the focus on their improvement as a group.

Another change: The state Office of Public Instruction has reclassified schools as "priority" (lowest 5 percent of Title I schools), "focus" (lowest 10 percent of Title I schools) and "reward" (highest-performing" or "high-progress.")

Monticello Middle School is Longview's only school on the priority list, Jones said.

"Priority schools have expectations to turn around performance, close opportunity gaps and substantially improve student outcomes," she said. Monticello is in the third year of a $250,000 grant to meet those goals.

Longview has one school on the focus list — Kessler Elementary School — and Kelso has two — Coweeman and Huntington middle schools. All three of those schools made the list because the special education students show low achievement, according to the OSPI chart.

Jones said districts will receive about $20,000 per focus school to close the gap between the main student population and the special ed subgroup.

Based on a needs assessment, "we might devote some of those dollars to additional teachers," she said. In the past, districts weren't allowed to spend Title I funds on special education.

Jones said one of the three main reasons Washington received the waiver was the new Teacher-Principal Evaluation system that is being developed. Kelso's Superintendent Rob MacGregor is involved in piloting the new process. Earlier this year he said it will ensure teachers are giving quality instruction while offering them opportunities to grow in their craft.

MacGregor was out of town last week. A future Daily News report will explore how the NCLB waiver will affect Kelso students.

Copyright 2015 Longview Daily News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. Horatio Bunce
    Report Abuse
    Horatio Bunce - July 22, 2012 7:38 pm
    OK parents. If you kid is in a low performing school, do not expect them to improve the performance of the school or let your kid go to a better school, they will simply start a new "program" to improve the cesspool of a school your kids are currently attending.
  2. Diane Dick
    Report Abuse
    Diane Dick - July 23, 2012 10:42 am
    Horatio- This state has a long-standing law (pre NCLB) that allows a parent the choice to enroll their child in ANY public school in the state that will accept them if they believe it will be better for their student. Granted the parent has to provide transportation, but transportation has never been a basic ed right for students. A "low-performing" school is not the same as a "low-performing" student, and it's the latter a parent should be most concerned about if it is their kid.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick